Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Delhi's Skies and Skepticism: Is Cloud Seeding a Solution, or Just a Show?

  • Nishadil
  • October 30, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 3 Views
Delhi's Skies and Skepticism: Is Cloud Seeding a Solution, or Just a Show?

Oh, Delhi. The air you breathe, or rather, struggle to breathe, has once again become the epicenter of a rather familiar political spectacle. You see, with the winter haze — let’s call it the "smog season" — descending upon the capital, new ideas, sometimes quite novel ones, inevitably surface. This year’s headline-grabber? Cloud seeding. An intriguing concept, to be sure, promising rain to wash away the airborne misery. But here's the thing: not everyone's buying into the meteorological magic, especially not the Aam Aadmi Party.

Environment Minister Gopal Rai, a man who, in truth, has seen his fair share of proposals aimed at rescuing Delhi's lungs, has come right out and called this particular cloud-seeding exercise precisely what he believes it is: a "publicity-driven activity." His skepticism, frankly, isn't just a casual observation; it’s rooted in what he describes as a startling lack of preparedness. Imagine proposing a major scientific endeavor, one that involves tweaking the very heavens, without even a detailed blueprint. That’s essentially what Rai alleges is happening here.

IIT-Kanpur, the esteemed institution tasked with exploring this atmospheric intervention, hasn't, according to Rai, provided the comprehensive proposal one would expect. And, perhaps more crucially, they haven't secured the necessary permissions from the central government. It leaves one wondering, doesn't it, how a project of this scale could even begin to take flight, quite literally, without those fundamental building blocks?

Now, this isn’t the first time Delhi has been presented with a seemingly innovative, albeit controversial, solution to its perpetual pollution woes. Rai himself didn't hesitate to draw parallels with the infamous "smog tower" experiment from the previous year. You remember that, don’t you? Towering structures meant to suck the bad air right out of the sky. Well, that too, in the AAP's eyes, quickly morphed into little more than a "publicity stunt." And, you could say, the efficacy of that colossal contraption remains, shall we put it delicately, debatable.

The minister didn’t mince words when he spoke of the vast sums Delhi receives from the Centre – a staggering 17,000 crore, mind you – specifically earmarked for combating air pollution. Yet, for all that investment, the city continues to grapple with a crisis that feels, at times, insurmountable. This context, then, makes the push for cloud seeding feel less like a groundbreaking scientific initiative and more like, dare I say, a desperate scramble for a quick fix.

The call from the AAP, and honestly, from many concerned citizens and experts, is for something more substantial. We're talking about long-term strategies, not "short-term gimmicks." Because, let’s be real, you can’t wish away deep-seated environmental issues with a spray from an airplane. Even independent bodies like the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) have voiced concerns, questioning the actual impact cloud seeding might have on urban air quality, suggesting its effectiveness against pollution might be, well, limited at best.

The original proposal, for what it’s worth, envisioned spraying chemicals into clouds between November 20 and 21, covering a mere 100 square kilometers, all for a cool 13 crore rupees. It sounds grand, doesn't it? A precise window, a specific cost, a targeted area. But when the foundations—the detailed plans, the permissions—are shaky, even the most appealing ideas can dissolve, much like a fleeting cloud, into mere political vapor. And so, Delhi waits, not just for cleaner air, but for genuine, tangible efforts that transcend the ever-present political theatrics.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on