Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Delhi's Ash Challenge: The Unfinished Business of Waste-to-Energy Plants

  • Nishadil
  • February 06, 2026
  • 0 Comments
  • 4 minutes read
  • 2 Views
Delhi's Ash Challenge: The Unfinished Business of Waste-to-Energy Plants

Tehkhand Leads in Ash Reuse, Okhla Lags Behind as Delhi Grapples with WTE Byproducts

Delhi's waste-to-energy plants face scrutiny over ash disposal. While Tehkhand boasts 100% ash reuse, Okhla struggles with just 20-40%, prompting NGT concern about hazardous fly ash management.

You know, in a city like Delhi, where waste generation is just immense, our waste-to-energy (WTE) plants are supposed to be a big part of the solution. They burn our rubbish, generate electricity, and theoretically, help reduce landfill burden. But there's always a "but," isn't there? The byproduct of all this burning is ash, and how we handle that ash is becoming a critical environmental concern.

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) recently had to answer to the National Green Tribunal (NGT) about this very issue, and the report card is, well, a bit mixed. We've got two major WTE plants in focus: Tehkhand and Okhla. The good news? Tehkhand, according to the MCD, is doing an incredible job, managing to reuse a full 100% of its bottom ash. That's fantastic, truly, showing what's possible when things are managed well.

Now, for the other side of the coin. The Okhla WTE plant, unfortunately, isn't quite hitting those numbers. Their reuse rate for bottom ash is hovering between a disappointing 20% to 40%. That leaves a significant amount of ash that still needs to be dealt with, and it’s creating a bit of a headache, especially concerning the more problematic type: fly ash.

Here’s the rub: not all ash is created equal. Bottom ash, the heavier, coarser material left after incineration, is relatively benign and can often be used in construction. Think aggregate for roads or building blocks. Fly ash, however, is a different beast entirely. It's the fine, powdery stuff that goes up with the flue gases, and it's notoriously hazardous. Why? Because it tends to concentrate heavy metals and other toxic substances, making its disposal a delicate and costly affair. It absolutely can't just be dumped anywhere; it requires special hazardous waste landfills to prevent environmental contamination.

The NGT, quite rightly, has expressed serious concern about this. They've been on this case since 2021, pushing for scientific and sustainable ways to handle the mountains of ash these plants generate. And it really is mountains – the Okhla plant alone churns out anywhere from 1,000 to 1,200 tonnes of ash every single day! A big chunk of that, about 300-400 tonnes, is the tricky fly ash, with the remaining 700-800 tonnes being bottom ash. Tehkhand, for its part, handles 2,000 tonnes of waste daily, producing 500-600 tonnes of ash.

So, what’s the plan? The MCD is actively exploring options, proposing to use both bottom ash and fly ash in the manufacturing of construction materials like bricks, tiles, and blocks. They're also looking into using it for road construction, which would be a brilliant circular economy solution if implemented successfully. A crucial meeting recently took place, bringing together various stakeholders like the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC), Delhi Jal Board (DJB), and Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to brainstorm and strategize on ash utilization. The CPCB, bless them, already has comprehensive guidelines in place for just this sort of thing, offering a clear path forward.

Ultimately, the goal is clear: zero waste. While achieving 100% reuse for all ash might be an ambitious target, the Tehkhand plant demonstrates it’s not impossible for bottom ash. The real challenge, and where Okhla truly needs to step up its game, lies in innovating and implementing robust solutions for that hazardous fly ash. It's not just about burning waste; it's about responsibly managing every single byproduct, ensuring that our efforts to clean up the city don't inadvertently create new environmental problems down the line.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on