Delhi High Court Steps In: Major Sandeep Unnikrishnan's Parents' Concerns Must Be Heard Before Film Release

There's a new, quite crucial development concerning the highly anticipated film "Major," a biopic dedicated to the incredibly brave life of Major Sandeep Unnikrishnan, who, as we all remember, made the ultimate sacrifice during the horrific 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The Delhi High Court has recently made a very clear pronouncement, emphasizing that the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) absolutely must take into account the rather serious objections raised by Major Sandeep's parents before granting the film its final green light for public release. This, one can certainly agree, is a deeply sensitive matter, and understandably so.

The parents, Mr. K. Unnikrishnan and Mrs. Dhanalakshmi Unnikrishnan, have approached the court, carrying with them some truly genuine concerns about how the film plans to portray their beloved son. One can only begin to imagine the immense emotional toll it must take when your child's life story is adapted for the silver screen, and their desire for utmost accuracy and profoundly respectful representation is, frankly, entirely warranted. They've specifically voiced anxieties about certain scenes and particular elements within the movie, which they fear might not quite align with the true spirit or the actual facts of their son's life and his monumental sacrifice. It's not merely about historical accuracy; it's fundamentally about preserving a cherished legacy.

Their heartfelt plea to the court, at its core, highlighted a very crucial point: they, as Major Sandeep's immediate and closest family, truly believe they should have been given a proper, adequate opportunity to review the film before it was released to the wider public. They sought a pre-screening, harboring the hope that they could offer their invaluable insights and, in doing so, help ensure that their son's memory is honored precisely and perfectly as it should be. The High Court, after carefully listening to their earnest appeal, has now directed the CBFC to ensure that these very specific objections are not only thoroughly examined but also thoughtfully considered as an integral part of the certification process.

This particular ruling, in essence, underscores the CBFC's responsibility—a responsibility that extends beyond merely certifying films based on broad, generic guidelines. It also stresses the need to exercise immense sensitivity, especially when dealing with biographical accounts of national heroes and, crucially, the deeply felt emotions of their immediate families. It serves as a powerful reminder that while creative freedom is, without a doubt, immensely important, it sometimes needs to be carefully balanced with the profound human element and the powerful emotional connection families inherently have to their loved ones' stories. One would certainly hope that this decision paves the way for a more collaborative, and indeed, a more empathetic approach in such incredibly sensitive productions moving forward.