Delhi High Court Steps In: Contempt Plea Against AAP Minister Gopal Rai and Journalist
- Nishadil
- May 23, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 8 Views
- Save
- Follow Topic
Delhi High Court Seeks Explanations from AAP Minister Gopal Rai and Journalist in Contempt Case
The Delhi High Court has issued a notice to AAP minister Gopal Rai and journalist Rauf Ahmad regarding a contempt plea, alleging they criticized a court order related to CM Arvind Kejriwal's arrest. The court seeks their response by July 15.
You know, the Delhi High Court has recently taken a pretty significant step, issuing a notice that demands responses from none other than Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) minister Gopal Rai and a journalist named Rauf Ahmad. It's quite a development, really, stemming from a contempt plea that alleges some serious misconduct on their part.
The core of the matter, as presented to the court, revolves around accusations of 'criminal contempt.' This isn't a light charge, mind you. The plea, which was brought forward by a law student named Aman Panwar, claims that both Rai and Ahmad made statements and published an article, respectively, which heavily criticized a specific single-judge order. That order, crucially, concerned the arrest of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and the summons he received from the Enforcement Directorate.
According to Panwar, their actions were nothing short of an attempt to 'scandalise' and 'lower the authority' of the court itself. It's a strong assertion, suggesting that the minister's public statements on March 21 and the journalist's article, published the very next day on March 22, truly crossed a line. The student's petition elaborates, calling these remarks 'scurrilous' and 'malicious,' arguing they were clearly designed to interfere with the smooth administration of justice – a cornerstone of our legal system, after all.
Justice Subramonium Prasad, after hearing the initial arguments and considering the gravity of the allegations, has indeed issued a notice, asking both Rai and Ahmad to explain their positions. The next hearing, we're told, is slated for July 15. So, it appears the court is taking these allegations quite seriously, and we'll just have to wait and see how the respondents choose to address these rather weighty charges when their turn comes.
Editorial note: Nishadil may use AI assistance for news drafting and formatting. Readers can report issues from this page, and material corrections are reviewed under our editorial standards.
