Delayed Justice: Guelph Police Constable's Penalty Hearing Pushed Back Amidst Police Act Breach
Share- Nishadil
- September 10, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 1 minutes read
- 3 Views

A crucial penalty hearing for Guelph Police Constable Jennifer Madsen has been delayed, extending the wait for a resolution in a case that has seen her found guilty of discreditable conduct and deceit under the Police Services Act. The hearing, originally scheduled for Wednesday, May 1st, has been adjourned until July, much to the frustration of those following the proceedings closely.
Constable Madsen’s charges stem from a serious incident in 2018, following a fatal collision involving her ex-boyfriend, Constable Corey McArthur, and a young woman named Dana Sarson.
Madsen was found to have provided false information, claiming she was present at the scene and witnessed the accident, when in fact, she was not. Furthermore, she was accused of improperly accessing confidential police information related to the investigation and subsequently divulging that sensitive data to a reporter.
These actions led to findings of guilt on both counts of discreditable conduct and deceit.
The recent delay was granted following a request from Madsen’s legal counsel for an adjournment. The lawyer cited ongoing issues with the Police Association, indicating that these internal matters needed to be resolved before the penalty phase could proceed.
While such delays are not uncommon in legal proceedings, they nonetheless prolong the process and the anticipation surrounding the final outcome for Constable Madsen’s career.
With the new hearing date now set for July, all parties involved – from the Police Services Board to the public – must wait further for the determination of the consequences for Constable Madsen’s proven breaches of professional conduct.
The eventual decision will undoubtedly send a significant message regarding accountability and integrity within the Guelph Police Service.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on