CM Mann's Stance on Chandigarh: A Principled Stand for Punjab's Rights

There's a curious blend of commendation and resolute assertion coming from Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann these days, especially when the conversation turns to Chandigarh. You see, while he's publicly lauded the Union government's recent move to halt the auction of a significant property belonging to the Chandigarh Group of Colleges (CGC) in Sector 26, his underlying message remains crystal clear: Punjab simply cannot be sidelined when it comes to the affairs of its own capital.

It's quite the nuanced position, isn't it? On one hand, Mann genuinely praised the Centre for stepping in and preventing what he termed a potential "big scam." He expressed gratitude, even, that the property, which belongs to the educational institution and therefore serves a public purpose, wasn't allowed to fall into private hands through an auction orchestrated by the Chandigarh administration. In his view, this was a responsible and welcome intervention, saving a valuable asset from being "grabbed" by opportunistic elements.

However, and this is where the deeper political currents surface, Mann quickly pivoted from specific praise to a broader, more fundamental argument. "Look," he essentially stated, "while we appreciate this particular action, let's not forget the bigger picture here. Chandigarh is Punjab's capital, plain and simple. It was built with our resources, with the sacrifices of our people, and it rightfully belongs to us." He wasn't shy about reminding everyone that any major decision concerning the city, any administrative shift, any bill – whatever form it takes – absolutely must involve Punjab. Bypassing the state, in his eyes, isn't just an oversight; it’s an affront.

This sentiment, of course, isn't new. It echoes a long-standing contention between Punjab and the Centre regarding Chandigarh's unique status as a Union Territory, concurrently serving as the capital for both Punjab and Haryana. Over the years, there have been numerous instances where Punjab has felt its rightful claims or administrative role in Chandigarh has been overlooked or deliberately circumvented. Mann’s statements reflect this historical friction, pointing out that such unilateral decisions, like those regarding the deployment of officers on deputation or certain administrative 'bills,' consistently ignore Punjab's undeniable stake.

For Chief Minister Mann, it boils down to a matter of principle and a deep sense of historical ownership. He's making it abundantly clear that while cooperation is welcome, particularly when it prevents what he sees as malpractice, it doesn't diminish Punjab's unwavering demand for its rightful say and control over Chandigarh. It's a powerful message, reiterating that Punjab's connection to Chandigarh isn't merely administrative; it's intrinsic, deeply rooted, and non-negotiable.