Delhi | 25°C (windy)
CEC's Kolkata Visit Rocked by Protests Amidst Sandeshkhali Storm

High Drama in Kolkata: CEC Gyanesh Kumar Confronted by Protesters Outside Kalighat Temple

Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar's review visit to West Bengal was met with fiery protests outside the iconic Kalighat Temple, as Trinamool Congress women activists waved black flags and chanted "Go Back" slogans, linking the Election Commission to ongoing political turmoil and the explosive Sandeshkhali issue.

It was hardly a quiet Sunday morning for Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar. As he stepped out of Kolkata’s revered Kalighat Temple, a place of spiritual solace for many, he was immediately engulfed not by devotees, but by a storm of political protest. A group of women, draped in the colours of the ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC), unleashed a barrage of "Go Back" slogans, their anger palpable, their message underscored by a sea of black flags waving defiantly in the air.

The incident, which unfolded on January 28, 2024, wasn't just a random outburst. Indeed, it cast a dramatic shadow over the CEC’s crucial three-day visit to West Bengal, a trip meticulously planned to take stock of the logistical and security landscape ahead of the much-anticipated Lok Sabha elections. But for these women, their grievances ran far deeper than election preparations; they were rooted in the simmering unrest of Sandeshkhali, a place that has recently become a symbol of alleged political violence and exploitation.

The protesters, visibly agitated, didn't mince words. They accused the Election Commission of India of being partisan, of allegedly "dancing to the tunes" of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Their central question was pointed, almost a challenge: why was the CEC visiting a temple in Kolkata, a city landmark, when the very real anguish of people in Sandeshkhali, a region in the North 24 Parganas district, begged for attention? It’s a region, mind you, where serious allegations of sexual harassment and land grab have been leveled against a local TMC strongman, igniting widespread protests and an intense political blame game.

While the street outside Kalighat thrummed with dissent, the CEC, accompanied by Election Commissioner Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Special Observer SS Chhabra, had actually been busy behind closed doors. Their agenda included critical meetings with district magistrates, superintendents of police, and various other officials. The goal? To meticulously assess the state’s readiness for the upcoming polls, ensuring everything from polling booth arrangements to law and order was in proper order.

Beyond the administrative review, the election body’s representatives also engaged in a dialogue with various political parties. The discussions, as one might expect in West Bengal’s charged political climate, were anything but tame. The TMC, for instance, voiced strong complaints about the alleged misuse of central agencies, suggesting they were being weaponized for political ends. On the other side, the BJP was equally vocal, pushing hard for the deployment of central forces at every single polling booth and accusing the TMC of actively obstructing free and fair elections.

The underlying tension, of course, circled back to Sandeshkhali. This small pocket of West Bengal has become a focal point of public outrage and political mud-slinging, with allegations of police inaction and a general breakdown of law and order echoing across the state. For the protesting women outside Kalighat, the CEC's visit to the temple, rather than directly addressing the Sandeshkhali crisis, seemed to embody a perceived disconnect, fueling their already fiery indignation. Their "Go Back" chants weren't just directed at an individual; they were a powerful, if desperate, plea for justice and acknowledgment from the highest election authority.

Comments 0
Please login to post a comment. Login
No approved comments yet.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on