Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Bombay High Court Demands Swift Justice: Seven-Year NDPS Trial Must Conclude in Six Months

  • Nishadil
  • December 30, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 2 Views
Bombay High Court Demands Swift Justice: Seven-Year NDPS Trial Must Conclude in Six Months

High Court Steps In: Yemeni National's Protracted NDPS Trial Gets Urgent Six-Month Deadline

After seven years in custody, a Yemeni national accused in an NDPS case finally sees a glimmer of hope as the Bombay High Court orders his trial to conclude within six months, citing a fundamental right to speedy justice.

In a powerful reminder that justice delayed is, indeed, justice denied, the Bombay High Court has stepped in to ensure that a Yemeni national, who has been languishing in custody for a staggering seven years, finally gets his day in court. The court, with a clear and firm directive, has mandated the Special NDPS Court to wrap up the trial against Khalid Saleh Bin Ghaleb within the next six months. It’s quite a situation, really, and it truly underscores the fundamental right every individual has to a timely legal process.

Imagine being held, year after agonizing year, for seven long years, awaiting your verdict. That's precisely the predicament of Khalid Saleh Bin Ghaleb, who was arrested way back in 2017. He's facing serious charges under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, specifically for allegedly possessing a commercial quantity of MD, or mephedrone. The case, as you can imagine, has been a significant part of his life for what must feel like an eternity, pending before a special NDPS court all this time.

Justice N.R. Borkar, presiding over the matter, didn't mince words. When hearing Ghaleb's plea, which notably wasn't for bail – his previous bail application had already been rejected – but rather for an expedited trial, the judge emphasized the severe and often irreparable prejudice caused to an accused by such prolonged incarceration. It’s not just a legal technicality; it’s about a person's life, their freedom, hanging in the balance, sometimes for years on end without a definitive resolution.

The court's observation was quite straightforward: seven years is simply too long. This extended period of pre-trial detention clearly infringes upon an individual's constitutional right to a speedy trial. This right, a cornerstone of any fair legal system, ensures that individuals aren't left in a state of limbo indefinitely, their lives put on hold while the wheels of justice turn at a snail's pace. The High Court, therefore, directed the special court to really prioritize this case, ensuring it's heard on a day-to-day basis if needed, to meet that crucial six-month deadline.

Ultimately, this ruling is more than just a directive for one particular case. It serves as a vital signal to lower courts about the absolute necessity of expediting trials, particularly when an accused has already spent a significant amount of time in custody. It’s a powerful push towards making our justice system not just fair, but also efficient and, frankly, more humane. Let's hope this brings some much-needed closure, one way or another, for Khalid Saleh Bin Ghaleb.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on