Bihar's Hijab Tangle: From Freedom of Choice to 'Go to Hell' – A Political Firestorm
Share- Nishadil
- December 19, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 3 Views
Giriraj Singh's Explosive Remark Ignites Bihar Politics After Nitish Kumar's Stance on Hijab
A debate over women's right to wear the hijab in Bihar has taken a sharp turn with Union Minister Giriraj Singh's controversial "go to hell" comment, sparking furious demands for an apology from opposition parties.
Well, what a firestorm has erupted in Bihar! It all began, as many political squabbles do, with a statement on individual liberty, but quickly escalated into something far more volatile. At the heart of it? Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar’s rather unequivocal stance on women's right to choose their attire, particularly the hijab, and then, the absolutely incendiary retort from Union Minister Giriraj Singh.
Kumar, a leader known for his measured political moves, had been quite clear. When questioned by journalists, he reiterated his conviction that women possess the autonomy to choose their attire, whether it be a hijab or anything else, and that the government, frankly, has no business interfering. He even went so far as to reference the ongoing hijab controversy in Karnataka, emphasizing that everyone has the right to practice their faith and wear what they wish. This isn't just a local spat, mind you; it touches on the much broader national discussion around personal freedoms and the Uniform Civil Code.
But then, oh, then came the truly shocking part. Union Minister Giriraj Singh, a prominent BJP leader and never one to shy away from controversy, was cornered by reporters for his thoughts on Kumar's statement. And his response? An astonishing, utterly dismissive, "The woman can go to hell." Yes, you read that right. "The woman can go to hell." It's hard to imagine a more abrupt and frankly, rude, dismissal of a serious topic and a fellow politician's perspective.
Naturally, such a brazen comment couldn't possibly go unchallenged. The political temperature, already simmering, boiled over instantly. Opposition parties wasted absolutely no time in launching a furious condemnation, and frankly, who can blame them? Lalu Prasad Yadav, the seasoned chief of the RJD, alongside his son Tejashwi Yadav, minced no words, demanding an immediate apology from Giriraj Singh. Tejashwi, ever vocal, lashed out, calling the remark "shameful" and a blatant disrespect to women and the entire society. He challenged the BJP – "Does this reflect your party’s ideology?" he essentially asked. Indeed, the Congress party also joined the chorus of outrage, with leaders like Prem Chandra Mishra calling the comment utterly "unacceptable" and demanding accountability.
Predictably, the BJP, finding itself in a rather awkward and defensive position, quickly tried to distance itself from Singh's individual outburst. Senior party figures were quick to label it as Giriraj Singh’s "personal view," a classic move to contain the damage. However, the opposition wasn't having any of it. They argued that given Singh's position as a Union Minister and a high-profile party leader, the BJP couldn't simply wash its hands of responsibility. An apology, they insisted, wasn't just needed from Singh himself, but from the party leadership for allowing such offensive language to be uttered by one of their own.
This whole episode, you see, isn't just about a simple remark. It's a stark reminder of the often-heated and sometimes deeply divisive nature of political discourse in India, especially when it touches upon matters of religion, personal freedom, and women's rights. As the clamour for an apology continues to reverberate across the political landscape of Bihar and beyond, one can only wonder how much longer this particular fire will burn. It certainly adds another layer of complexity to an already delicate national conversation.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on