Beyond the Runway: Former 'America's Next Top Model' Contestants Unveil a Darker Reality
Share- Nishadil
- February 20, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 5 minutes read
- 7 Views
The 'ANTM' Reckoning: Contestants Speak Out on a New Documentary Exposing the Show's Underbelly
A new docuseries is stirring up old controversies as former America's Next Top Model contestants revisit their painful experiences on the iconic reality show, hoping to finally expose the truth behind the glamour.
Remember America's Next Top Model? For many of us, it was appointment television, a dazzling weekly dose of high fashion, dramatic makeovers, and Tyra Banks' iconic catchphrases. But beneath all that glossy ambition, a much darker narrative was unfolding for some of its contestants. And now, it seems, that story is finally getting its long-overdue moment in the spotlight, thanks to a burgeoning docuseries that's already got former models — and even some key crew members — talking.
There's a palpable buzz in the air, a sense of "it's about time," as details emerge about a new project by filmmaker Zoe Rose. This isn't just another retrospective; it's shaping up to be a deep dive into the alleged abuses, mental health toll, and outright exploitation that many models claim they endured during their time on the show. For years, these voices have echoed online, a chorus of shared trauma and frustration. Now, with the backing of a dedicated documentary, it feels like a reckoning might truly be at hand.
It's not just the former contestants who are speaking up, either. Jay Manuel, who was such a recognizable face on the show as the creative director, has openly acknowledged his involvement with this new docuseries. This isn't entirely surprising, given he's also been working on his own book and documentary delving into his experiences. His participation certainly lends a significant layer of credibility and inside perspective to the whole endeavor, doesn't it? It suggests there's a lot more to uncover than what we saw on our screens.
Take Nyle DiMarco, for instance, the incredibly charming and groundbreaking winner of Cycle 22. Even he, despite his eventual success, shared his thoughts on X (formerly Twitter), openly acknowledging the "trauma" associated with the show. What's interesting is Nyle's unique perspective; as a deaf contestant, he mentioned how his experience, in some ways, shielded him from certain verbal dynamics and the more overtly manipulative aspects of the environment. He didn't always catch every word, which, perhaps ironically, saved him from some of the psychological gymnastics others faced. Still, he stands firmly in support of exposing the truth, knowing full well the weight of what his peers went through.
Then there's Sarah Hartshorne from Cycle 9. If you've followed the ANTM controversies over the years, you'll know Sarah has been one of the most consistent and vocal critics. She’s been incredibly candid about the lack of compensation, the psychological impact, and the sheer unpreparedness models faced after being thrust into such an intense, often hostile, spotlight. She put it rather succinctly, if not a little sarcastically, saying something along the lines of, "It's wild that this docuseries is finally happening. Guess some things just take time, huh?" Her excitement is palpable, and frankly, her continued outspokenness has been a beacon for many other former contestants.
And let's not forget Lisa D'Amato, a memorable personality from Cycle 5 and All-Stars. Lisa has been very open about her own struggles, alleging "mental distress" and detailing how contestants often weren't paid residuals for their appearances, even as the show raked in massive profits. She, too, has championed the idea of a comprehensive exposé for years. These aren't isolated incidents, you see. These are stories that, when woven together, paint a pretty stark picture of a reality TV machine that, for all its glitz, often seemed to chew up and spit out its young, aspiring talent without a second thought.
The criticisms leveled against ANTM are, by now, quite well-documented, if not yet fully acknowledged by the show's creators. We're talking about everything from truly bizarre and sometimes racially insensitive photoshoots (remember the blackface incident or posing in coffins?) to the sheer mental toll of constant judgment, isolation, and a distinct lack of proper aftercare for contestants. The contracts, too, have been a major point of contention, often described as predatory, offering little in the way of financial compensation while demanding significant control over the models' images and futures. It's a sad reality that a show ostensibly about empowering women in fashion may have, in many ways, done the exact opposite for so many participants.
It's funny how timing works, isn't it? The emergence of this docuseries feels particularly resonant in the wake of movements like #MeToo, which have undeniably empowered more people to speak out against exploitation and power imbalances in various industries, including entertainment. Perhaps this is finally the moment for a genuine reckoning, a chance for these former models to not just share their stories, but to be truly heard and, perhaps, to even see some form of accountability. It’s a testament to their resilience, really, that after all these years, they’re still fighting for their truth to be seen, imperfections and all, just like any good human story should be.
- Entertainment
- UnitedStatesOfAmerica
- News
- EntertainmentNews
- MentalHealth
- Documentary
- TyraBanks
- Metoo
- ContestantExperiences
- AmericaSNextTopModel
- Antm
- ModelingIndustry
- HasproductTrue
- LocaleUs
- ContentTypeNews
- DisplaytypeStandardArticle
- SubsectionCelebs
- JayManuel
- CollectionNetflix
- ListenTime366
- CollectionRealityTvNews
- RealityTvExploitation
- NyleDimarco
- SarahHartshorne
- LisaDAmato
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on