Bengals' Offensive Enigma: Taylor Unpacks Chase & Higgins' Disappearing Act in Vikings Loss
Share- Nishadil
- September 23, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 4 Views

Cincinnati Bengals Head Coach Zac Taylor recently addressed the perplexing question on every fan's mind: why were star wide receivers Ja'Marr Chase and Tee Higgins so sparingly utilized in the team's 'ugly' loss to the Minnesota Vikings? The usually prolific duo combined for a shockingly low seven targets, leaving many to wonder about the offensive game plan.
Taylor's explanation, offered in the aftermath of the disappointing defeat, centered primarily on the 'flow of the game.' He highlighted the unexpected effectiveness of the Bengals' ground attack as a key factor.
Running back Joe Mixon was a legitimate bright spot, rumbling for an impressive 141 yards on 27 carries, including a crucial touchdown. This sustained success on the ground, Taylor suggested, dictated a different offensive rhythm than what's typically seen from the pass-heavy Bengals.
“The way the game was flowing, we were able to run the football and get some shorter passes going,” Taylor explained, hinting at a strategic pivot.
Indeed, the Bengals often opted for quick throws and shorter routes, likely aiming to mitigate the Vikings' pass rush and keep the chains moving. While this approach might work in some scenarios, it inherently reduces opportunities for deep threats like Chase and Higgins, who thrive on challenging coverage downfield.
Chase, typically a target monster, saw just four passes thrown his way, while Higgins, another cornerstone of the Bengals' aerial attack, was targeted a meager three times.
For an offense built around the explosive playmaking of these two Pro Bowl-caliber receivers, such limited involvement is not only unusual but frankly bewildering. It raises questions about adaptability, play-calling, and the ability to force the ball to playmakers when the initial game plan veers off course.
The sentiment after such a performance is undeniably one of frustration – both for the players, who undoubtedly want to contribute more, and for the fanbase, who expect their stars to be at the forefront of the attack, especially in a tight contest.
While the Bengals managed to keep the game competitive, the offensive struggles and the underutilization of their most dangerous weapons ultimately contributed to what Taylor himself labeled an 'ugly' outcome. Moving forward, the Bengals will need to find a way to consistently involve their top talent, regardless of game flow, if they hope to turn the tide on their season.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on