Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Awaiting Orders: Pakistan's Military Overhaul Sees CJCSC Gone, New Defence Chief's Role Undefined

  • Nishadil
  • November 28, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 4 minutes read
  • 2 Views
Awaiting Orders: Pakistan's Military Overhaul Sees CJCSC Gone, New Defence Chief's Role Undefined

There's a quiet, yet truly significant, transformation unfolding within Pakistan's top military echelons, a shift that's poised to redefine how our defence forces operate. For years, the Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, or CJCSC, has been a pivotal, albeit primarily advisory, four-star role. Well, that post, as we knew it, is now formally gone, swept away by a recent presidential order. In its place, a new, potentially much more powerful position has been created: the Chief of Defence Forces (CDF).

This is big news, really. We're talking about a move towards a more unified command structure, a concept many have advocated for. The idea is to foster even greater synergy among the Army, Navy, and Air Force. And, excitingly, we already know who's set to take the reins: General Sahir Shamshad Mirza, who previously served as CJCSC, is earmarked to become Pakistan's inaugural Chief of Defence Forces. You’d think with such a clear direction, everything would be in place, right?

Ah, but here's where things get a tad complicated, leaving everyone, from military analysts to those within the armed forces, in a curious state of limbo. While the presidential order establishing the CDF post was indeed issued last month, the crucial, absolutely vital, official notification detailing the new role's terms of reference (ToRs), its exact powers, its responsibilities, and, perhaps most importantly, its operational command structure, is still conspicuously missing. It’s almost as if the stage is set, the lead actor is ready, but the script hasn't quite arrived yet.

This delay, you see, isn't just a bureaucratic hiccup; it creates a very real ambiguity. Without a clear mandate, General Mirza, despite holding the four-star rank, can't fully assume the extensive operational authority that this new Chief of Defence Forces position is expected to wield. It leaves a certain gap, a space where clarity should be, hindering the very "unified command" this reform aims to achieve. The whole point was to move beyond the advisory nature of the CJCSC to a more hands-on, commanding role, streamlining operations across the services.

Think about it: for such a significant shift to genuinely take root, amendments are needed across the board – in the service rules for the Army, Navy, and Air Force. These aren't minor tweaks; they're fundamental changes that dictate how commands are given, how forces collaborate, and how resources are managed. Until these amendments are clearly laid out in an official notification, the new CDF, for all intents and purposes, operates without the full backing of clearly defined directives. It’s like having a grand vision but no blueprint.

Historically, the CJCSC role primarily focused on coordination and advising the government on strategic defence matters, but it lacked direct operational control over the individual service chiefs. The aspiration for the CDF, inspired perhaps by similar roles in other countries like India's Chief of Defence Staff, is to provide a single point of military advice to the political leadership and to oversee and integrate the joint capabilities of all three services. This is a monumental task, demanding crystal-clear definitions from day one.

So, as Pakistan steps into this new chapter of its military history, the eyes of many are fixed on Islamabad, patiently (or perhaps not so patiently) awaiting that pivotal notification. It’s more than just a piece of paper; it's the very foundation upon which the effectiveness and strategic impact of the new Chief of Defence Forces will be built. Here's hoping that clarity arrives sooner rather than later, allowing this ambitious reform to truly fulfill its promise of a more cohesive and formidable national defence.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on