Delhi | 25°C (windy)

Australian Watchdog Mandates Urgent Audit for Binance Unit Amid Escalating Money Laundering Fears

  • Nishadil
  • August 22, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 2 minutes read
  • 8 Views
Australian Watchdog Mandates Urgent Audit for Binance Unit Amid Escalating Money Laundering Fears

Australia's financial intelligence and regulatory body, AUSTRAC, has taken decisive action, ordering Binance Australia Derivatives to undergo an extensive external audit. This stringent measure comes in response to significant concerns surrounding potential money laundering and terrorism financing risks associated with the crypto exchange's operations.

The directive spotlights a period of intense scrutiny for the cryptocurrency giant globally, and specifically within Australia.

It follows closely on the heels of Binance Australia (Binance Markets), the parent company of the derivatives unit, cancelling its Australian financial services license back in May. The cancellation itself underscored a shifting regulatory landscape and a proactive move by Binance to adapt, albeit not enough to allay all concerns.

Under the terms of AUSTRAC's order, an independent auditor will be tasked with conducting a thorough assessment of Binance Australia Derivatives' compliance with its comprehensive anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) obligations.

This audit is not merely a formality; it's a deep dive into the company's systems and processes, ensuring they meet the robust standards required to protect Australia's financial ecosystem from illicit activities.

The independent auditor is expected to deliver their findings in a detailed report to AUSTRAC within a strict 120-day timeframe.

This tight deadline emphasizes the urgency with which the watchdog views these potential vulnerabilities.

Nicole Rose, the chief executive of AUSTRAC, reiterated the critical importance of all regulated entities adhering strictly to AML/CTF laws. Her statement underscores the agency's unwavering commitment to safeguarding the integrity of Australia's financial system against exploitation by criminals.

In response to the order, Binance has confirmed its full cooperation with AUSTRAC.

The company has publicly stated its commitment to working closely with the agency to address any concerns and ensure ongoing compliance. This cooperative stance is vital as Binance navigates a complex global regulatory environment.

This isn't Binance Australia's first encounter with a challenging regulatory climate.

The firm ceased offering its derivatives product on April 13, advising users to close their positions by April 14. Prior to that, in February 2022, Binance had already halted options, futures, and leveraged token products for its Australian users, citing prevailing regulatory uncertainties as the reason for the withdrawal.

Globally, Binance continues to face a barrage of regulatory challenges and investigations.

In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit against the exchange, alleging it operated an unregistered exchange, among other serious charges. Concurrently, the U.S. Justice Department is reportedly investigating Binance over potential money laundering and sanctions violations, signalling a comprehensive federal inquiry.

Further compounding its international woes, France has launched its own investigation into Binance concerning allegations of illegal provision of digital asset services and money laundering.

And in Germany, the financial watchdog BaFin notably declined to issue a license for Binance's crypto custody service, indicating a cautious approach from European regulators as well. This consistent global scrutiny highlights the immense pressure on Binance to demonstrate robust compliance and transparency across all its operational jurisdictions.

.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on