Appeals Court Upholds Block on Trump's Attempt to Cut $5 Million in Foreign Aid

A federal appeals court has decisively ruled against the Trump administration's efforts to halt nearly $5 million in crucial foreign aid designated for three Central American nations. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision, concluding that the administration lacked the legal authority to unilaterally withhold funds appropriated by Congress.

The controversy stemmed from the Trump administration's move in March 2019 to freeze aid to El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras.

This action was taken under the premise that these countries were not doing enough to curb the flow of migrants heading towards the United States border. This decision immediately sparked significant opposition from various groups and lawmakers.

The lawsuit challenging the administration's action was spearheaded by the House Foreign Affairs Committee, led by Chairman Eliot Engel (D-NY), alongside a coalition of advocacy organizations, including Oxfam America and Casa de Maryland.

These groups argued that the president's attempt to block congressionally approved funds violated federal law and encroached upon legislative powers.

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan had previously sided with the plaintiffs, issuing a ruling that found the administration's actions to be unlawful.

The appeals court's recent judgment upholds this earlier decision, reinforcing the principle that Congress, not the Executive Branch, holds the ultimate authority over government spending.

Central to the appeals court's reasoning was the Impoundment Control Act of 1974. This critical piece of legislation dictates that the president must secure congressional approval before withholding funds that have already been appropriated.

The court explicitly stated that the administration's attempt to unilaterally freeze the aid contravened this act, which was designed to prevent the Executive Branch from circumventing congressional spending mandates.

The ruling emphasized the constitutional framework that vests the power of the purse squarely with Congress.

By affirming the lower court's decision, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has ensured that the nearly $5 million in aid will be released to the Central American countries. This outcome represents a significant victory for congressional oversight and a firm check on presidential authority regarding appropriated funds.

Chairman Engel lauded the court's decision, highlighting its importance in safeguarding the legislative branch's constitutional role.

The ruling underscores the enduring legal and constitutional boundaries that govern the distribution of foreign aid and other federal appropriations.