Alliance on the Brink? DMK-Congress Seat-Sharing Sparks Political Firestorm in Tamil Nadu
Share- Nishadil
- September 24, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 4 Views

The political landscape of Tamil Nadu is currently experiencing significant tremors as the long-standing alliance between the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and the Indian National Congress faces its most potent challenge yet: a public and acrimonious dispute over seat-sharing for the upcoming Lok Sabha elections.
What began as internal discussions has spilled into the public arena, threatening the very fabric of their coalition and providing fodder for the opposition.
The first significant crack emerged with a pointed statement from DMK MP Kanimozhi, who unequivocally declared that the Congress party is not in a position to dictate terms regarding seat allocation.
Her message was clear: Congress should accept what is offered, implying a take-it-or-leave-it stance from the dominant DMK. This bold assertion immediately ignited a furious reaction from within the Congress ranks, laying bare the underlying tensions.
Tamil Nadu Congress Committee President KS Alagiri swiftly retorted, emphasizing the historical significance and enduring strength of the Congress party.
He passionately reminded the DMK that Congress is not a minor player to be sidelined, but a formidable force that has been a cornerstone of their alliance. Alagiri asserted that any seat-sharing arrangement must be built on mutual respect and a fair distribution, warning that the Congress would not meekly accept an "insignificant" number of seats.
His comments underscored a growing sentiment within the Congress that their contributions to the alliance have been undervalued.
Seizing upon this brewing storm with evident delight, AIADMK chief Edappadi K. Palaniswami wasted no time in mocking the DMK-Congress partnership. Labeling it a "Drama Alliance," Palaniswami gleefully predicted its imminent collapse, citing the internal squabbles over seat distribution as irrefutable evidence.
He drew parallels to past electoral cycles, highlighting instances where the Congress, despite its historical standing, appeared to be pushed into a corner by the DMK, forced to accept a reduced share. Palaniswami's strategic criticism aimed to sow further discord and project the AIADMK as the stable alternative.
Amidst the escalating rhetoric, DMK President and Chief Minister M.K.
Stalin stepped in to play the role of peacemaker, attempting to douse the flames. He downplayed the public disagreements, assuring the media and the public that discussions were ongoing and that a positive, mutually agreeable outcome was anticipated. Stalin reiterated his faith in the alliance's unity, underscoring its importance in the broader political landscape and its collective goal against the opposition.
His efforts were clearly aimed at controlling the narrative and preventing further damage to the coalition's image.
The crux of the matter lies in the numbers. In the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, Congress was allocated nine seats, a figure they now seek to maintain or improve upon. However, with DMK's increased dominance in the state and the inclusion of other significant allies like the VCK and various Left parties, the pie for the Congress appears to be shrinking.
The DMK, buoyed by its strong performance in recent state elections, feels justified in asserting its prerogative and perhaps offering fewer seats to its national partner.
While leaders publicly strive to project an image of unwavering unity, the undercurrents of discontent are undeniable. The public exchange of sharp words signals a deeper struggle for power and recognition within the alliance.
As the Lok Sabha elections draw nearer, the ability of the DMK and Congress to bridge these differences will be a critical test of their political maturity and the true strength of their partnership. The stakes are high, and the opposition is watching closely, ready to capitalize on any lasting fissures.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on