Aligarh's Diwali Cracker Controversy: From Deities to Cricketers to 'Operation Sindoor'
Share- Nishadil
- October 18, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 4 Views

Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, recently found itself at the heart of a curious and controversial incident involving Diwali firecrackers, a local shopkeeper, and a rapidly escalating series of product displays that caught national attention. The story began innocently enough, with a fireworks vendor in the city setting up shop ahead of the festive season.
Initially, his wares featured packaging adorned with images of Hindu deities, a common practice during Diwali, but one that soon drew a complaint from a local resident.
Responding to this initial complaint, the shopkeeper, identified as Sachin, made an immediate adjustment to his inventory. Instead of removing the controversial practice altogether, he pivoted, replacing the deity images with those of popular Indian cricketers: the dynamic Rinku Singh and the acclaimed Mohammad Shami.
This change, while seemingly innocuous, inadvertently stirred a new pot of controversy, primarily due to the religious backgrounds of the featured athletes. The move was perceived by some as an attempt to leverage their popularity in a way that could be seen as disrespectful or exploitative, particularly in the context of firecrackers.
However, the saga didn't end there.
In a move that truly amplified the controversy and garnered widespread media scrutiny, the shopkeeper once again altered his cracker packaging. This time, he introduced firecrackers branded with a highly provocative and politically charged slogan: 'Operation Sindoor.' This phrase is associated with a contentious social narrative, and its appearance on Diwali fireworks ignited a fresh wave of public outrage and condemnation.
The continuous shifts in imagery, from religious figures to sports stars, and then to a controversial social slogan, highlighted a deep misunderstanding of public sentiment and potentially a deliberate attempt to court controversy for publicity.
Local residents and social organizations quickly voiced their displeasure, leading to a formal complaint being lodged against Sachin. Authorities swiftly took action, registering a case under Section 153A (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony) of the Indian Penal Code.
The incident in Aligarh served as a stark reminder of the sensitivities surrounding religious and cultural symbols, as well as public figures, especially during festive seasons.
It underscored the need for careful consideration and respect in product marketing, particularly when dealing with items intended for widespread public consumption. The legal action against the shopkeeper sends a clear message that such provocative displays will not be tolerated and that businesses must operate within the bounds of law and social harmony, even amidst the festive fervor of Diwali.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on