Akshay Kumar Secures Key Interim Relief from Bombay High Court in Long-Standing Personality Rights Dispute
Share- Nishadil
- October 16, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 1 minutes read
- 4 Views

In a significant legal development, Bollywood superstar Akshay Kumar has been granted crucial interim relief by the Bombay High Court in an ongoing personality rights dispute. The court's decision effectively stays the proceedings that were underway before the City Civil Court, offering a temporary reprieve to the actor in a case that dates back nearly two decades.
The personality rights case was initiated by film producer Aspi Nadiadwala, who alleged a breach of contract by Kumar.
The core of Nadiadwala's claim revolved around a film titled "Janam Kundli," which was slated for production in 2004 but ultimately remained unreleased or shelved. Nadiadwala contended that Kumar had violated an agreement related to this project.
According to reports, the producer had sought an injunction against Akshay Kumar, aiming to prevent the actor from working on any other film projects until the dispute regarding "Janam Kundli" was resolved.
This legal move could have potentially impacted Kumar's prolific career, known for its consistent output of films.
However, the Bombay High Court took a critical view of the timing of the lawsuit. During the proceedings, the court observed that the suit filed by Aspi Nadiadwala appeared to be an "afterthought." A key factor in this observation was the considerable delay: the suit was filed approximately 18 years after the alleged breach of contract occurred, raising questions about the immediacy and necessity of the legal action at this juncture.
Consequently, after considering the arguments presented, the High Court decided to grant interim relief to Akshay Kumar by staying the proceedings that were being heard by the City Civil Court.
This means that, for the time being, the legal battle in the lower court is paused, providing the actor with a significant, albeit temporary, respite from the long-standing legal challenge. This ruling underscores the judiciary's scrutiny of prolonged delays in initiating legal action, especially when it concerns commercial and contractual disputes in the entertainment industry.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on