Adani Group Stocks Skyrocket: SEBI Gives Unconditional Clean Chit in Hindenburg Allegations
Share- Nishadil
- September 19, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 6 Views

The financial markets are buzzing with renewed energy as Adani Group companies witness a spectacular rally, fueled by a definitive clean chit from the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in the high-profile Hindenburg Research allegations. This pivotal development, subsequently endorsed by the Supreme Court, marks a significant turning point for the conglomerate that faced unprecedented scrutiny.
SEBI's comprehensive investigation, a saga that captivated market watchers for months, has concluded with a clear verdict: no violations of disclosure norms or manipulative practices were found against the Adani Group.
This crucial finding comes in the wake of a Supreme Court directive issued in January, which urged the market regulator to finalize its probe. The apex court not only upheld SEBI's approach but also dismissed petitions demanding a more intrusive CBI investigation, reinforcing faith in the existing regulatory framework.
The market's reaction has been immediate and emphatic.
Adani Group stocks, including heavyweights like Adani Enterprises and Adani Power, have experienced a dramatic surge, signaling a powerful resurgence of investor confidence. This sharp uptick represents a substantial recovery from the tumultuous period that followed Hindenburg Research's January 2023 report, which accused the group of stock manipulation and accounting fraud, leading to an astonishing erosion of over $150 billion in market value.
Delving into the specifics, SEBI meticulously examined 24 separate cases stemming from the Hindenburg allegations.
Out of these, 22 investigations have been definitively concluded, with the regulator finding no actionable evidence of wrongdoing. The remaining two cases are pending, not due to any lingering doubts about Adani's conduct, but rather on account of necessary reliance on information from foreign jurisdictions, a process that inherently requires more time and international cooperation.
The Supreme Court's pronouncement further cemented the regulatory stance.
The bench, comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, underscored the limited scope of judicial review when it comes to SEBI's complex regulatory domain. The court explicitly stated that there was "no ground to direct SEBI to revoke its amendments" to the Foreign Portfolio Investor (FPI) and Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR) regulations, reinforcing the regulator's autonomy and expertise.
While acknowledging the "stock market volatility" unleashed by the Hindenburg report, the court firmly reiterated that it is "not for this court to enter the regulatory domain of SEBI," thus drawing a clear line between judicial oversight and direct regulatory intervention.
The journey for Adani Group began with a storm unleashed by Hindenburg Research, whose explosive report detailed allegations of extensive stock manipulation and accounting fraud.
This report sent shockwaves through the market, causing a precipitous drop in Adani shares and raising serious questions about the conglomerate's practices. The group vehemently denied all accusations, setting the stage for the rigorous regulatory and judicial review that has now culminated in this landmark decision.
With SEBI's clean chit now firmly in hand and the Supreme Court's imprimatur, the Adani Group stands at a pivotal juncture.
This resolution is expected to usher in an era of renewed stability and growth, as investors, both domestic and international, reassess their positions based on the clear regulatory findings. The saga serves as a powerful testament to the resilience of the Indian market and its regulatory mechanisms, reinforcing the principle that thorough investigation and judicial review ultimately prevail in upholding market integrity.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on