Delhi | 25°C (windy)

A Terrifying Morning: Father and Toddler Daughter Swept Away by ICE in Minneapolis

  • Nishadil
  • January 24, 2026
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 6 Views
A Terrifying Morning: Father and Toddler Daughter Swept Away by ICE in Minneapolis

ICE Detains Father and Two-Year-Old Daughter in Minneapolis, Sparking Outcry

A routine morning in Minneapolis turned into a nightmare when ICE agents took a father and his two-year-old daughter into custody, despite the family's claims of pending asylum applications.

Imagine waking up to a frantic knock, then finding your home swarming with federal agents – that's precisely what unfolded for a Minneapolis family this past spring. In what can only be described as a deeply unsettling scene, Ervin Mejia, a 39-year-old father, and his toddler, two-year-old Estefany, were taken into custody by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from their very own home. It’s a story that truly makes you pause and consider the human element behind immigration enforcement, you know, the real-life impact.

The incident, which happened just as the sun was thinking about rising, around 7 a.m., left the family reeling. Claudia Morales, Estefany’s mother and Mejia’s partner, recounted the terrifying morning, expressing her profound fear and confusion. She shared that ICE agents, after entering their residence, initially separated little Estefany from her dad. Can you even begin to picture the distress a two-year-old must feel, torn from her parent in such a bewildering situation? Thankfully, after some tense moments, they were reunited, but the trauma, one can only imagine, had already set in for everyone involved.

This isn't just a random encounter; it's a story with deep roots. Mejia and Morales, both originally from Honduras, fled their home country seeking refuge from a wave of violence. They were, by all accounts, attempting to navigate the labyrinthine U.S. immigration system. Mejia, in fact, had an ankle monitor, a condition of his release, and had been regularly checking in with ICE, doing exactly what he was told. The family maintains that he had active asylum applications and was awaiting a work permit – not exactly the profile of someone trying to evade authorities, right?

ICE, however, paints a different picture, albeit a rather succinct one. A spokesperson confirmed the operation, stating that Mejia is considered an “at-large immigration violator” and has had a final order of removal on his record since 2011. It's a stark contrast to the family's narrative, creating a painful gap between bureaucratic mandates and deeply personal realities. Attorney Susy de Leon, representing the family, firmly asserted that Mejia’s prior order of removal should be considered nullified, given his current, legitimate asylum claim and active petitions. It's a complex legal dance, to say the least, where interpretations can clash dramatically.

The events quickly galvanized the community. Supporters gathered outside the federal building in St. Paul, holding signs and voicing their outrage. Their message was clear: this kind of enforcement action, especially involving a child, is not only inhumane but also deeply disruptive to families who are striving for a better, safer life. The question that lingered in the air, and still does for many, is why such an aggressive tactic was necessary against a father who was already complying with federal oversight. It makes you wonder, doesn't it?

Ultimately, Ervin Mejia and Estefany were transferred to an immigration processing facility. The thought of a two-year-old in such a place, even if reunited with her father, is truly heartbreaking. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the often-harsh realities of immigration enforcement in America, touching the lives of individuals and families in profound, unforgettable ways. It leaves us pondering the balance between national security, legal processes, and the fundamental human right to family unity and safety.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on