Delhi | 25°C (windy)
A Plea for Clarity: PMK Founder Urges ECI to Freeze 'Mango' Symbol Amid Voter Confusion

Dr. S. Ramadoss to ECI: Stop Symbol Confusion, Freeze the Mango

PMK founder Dr. S. Ramadoss has made an urgent appeal to the Election Commission of India, asking them to freeze the 'mango' symbol in Tamil Nadu to prevent widespread voter confusion caused by its use by numerous independent candidates.

In a significant move that highlights the often-overlooked complexities of India's electoral landscape, Dr. S. Ramadoss, the respected founder of the Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK), has formally appealed to the Election Commission of India (ECI). His request is straightforward yet carries immense weight for his party: freeze the 'mango' symbol, at least within Tamil Nadu, to put an end to what he describes as pervasive voter confusion.

It’s a situation that, frankly, many voters might not even be aware of. For decades, this particular fruit has been inextricably linked with the Pattali Makkal Katchi, serving as their distinctive identifier on ballot papers and campaign materials alike. But here’s the rub: because PMK is currently only a recognised state party in Puducherry and merely a registered unrecognised party in its home state of Tamil Nadu, the ‘mango’ symbol isn't exclusively theirs across the board. This opens the door for other independent candidates, and even unrecognised parties, to adopt the very same symbol.

And boy, have they adopted it! Dr. Ramadoss didn’t just make a general complaint; he came armed with compelling data. Just imagine, in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, a staggering sixteen candidates in the Dharmapuri constituency all brandished the very same mango symbol. It must have been an absolute nightmare for voters trying to distinguish between them! Fast forward to 2019, and the issue persisted, with thirteen candidates across three constituencies – Salem, Dharmapuri, and Arani – all vying for votes under the same fruity banner. The problem wasn't confined to national elections either; the 2021 Assembly elections saw seventeen candidates in five different constituencies similarly employing the 'mango'.

One can only imagine the sheer bewilderment, especially among rural voters, who might not be as politically savvy or as familiar with the intricacies of election symbols. They see the mango, they associate it with PMK, and naturally, they might assume they are casting their vote for Dr. Ramadoss’s party. This isn't just a minor annoyance; it directly impacts PMK’s legitimate vote share, essentially siphoning away votes that were intended for them. It’s a question of fairness, really, and the integrity of the voting process.

The history here is important. The PMK has been synonymous with the mango symbol since way back in 1989. From 2004 until 2019, they held the status of a recognised state party in Tamil Nadu, meaning the mango was exclusively theirs. However, a dip in their vote share after the 2019 elections saw them lose that coveted status in Tamil Nadu, although they did manage to retain it in neighbouring Puducherry. This change in recognition is precisely what allows the symbol to be allotted to others.

So, what does Dr. Ramadoss propose? His appeal to the ECI is twofold. Ideally, he hopes the Election Commission will allocate a brand-new, exclusive symbol specifically for the PMK. If that’s not feasible, his alternative request is for the ECI to completely freeze the 'mango' symbol, preventing any other candidate or unrecognised party from using it across Tamil Nadu. With crucial elections on the horizon, the stakes are undeniably high for the PMK. This isn't just about a symbol; it's about ensuring that every vote truly counts and reflects the voter's genuine intent, a fundamental pillar of democracy.

Comments 0
Please login to post a comment. Login
No approved comments yet.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on