Delhi | 25°C (windy)

A Nation's Reckoning: Navigating Crisis Amidst Minneapolis Unrest

  • Nishadil
  • January 26, 2026
  • 0 Comments
  • 3 minutes read
  • 6 Views
A Nation's Reckoning: Navigating Crisis Amidst Minneapolis Unrest

White House Scrambles: Trump Considers Drastic Measures for Minneapolis Unrest

In the wake of intense unrest gripping Minneapolis following George Floyd's tragic death, the Trump administration reportedly weighed significant federal interventions, including the controversial deployment of active-duty military personnel, to restore order and quell mounting protests.

The air in Washington felt thick with tension back then, you know? President Trump, it seems, was really poring over every possible move the federal government could make to try and dial down the intense unrest brewing in Minneapolis. And among those options, a truly significant one was on the table: the potential deployment of active-duty military personnel. That's what a source, privy to those hushed discussions, shared with us at the time.

The situation was undeniably volatile; protests, ignited by the tragic death of George Floyd – an unarmed Black man who died while in police custody – had, in far too many places, regrettably spiraled into scenes of looting, widespread arson, and outright violence. So, the question weighing heavily on the White House wasn't just if to respond, but how to even begin addressing such a multifaceted crisis.

Among the serious deliberations was the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act – a pretty weighty piece of legislation that essentially gives the president power to deploy the military for domestic law enforcement. Or, perhaps, they considered a slightly less drastic but still significant move: dispatching federal law enforcement agents, folks from the Department of Justice, Homeland Security, or even the FBI, directly into the fray.

Reportedly, President Trump wasn't making these calls in a vacuum. He was in deep conversation with key figures: Attorney General Bill Barr, Defense Secretary Mark Esper, and General Mark Milley, who chairs the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Their input, one can only imagine, was crucial as they navigated such uncharted territory.

And it wasn't just his inner circle; Trump had apparently also touched base with Governor Tim Walz of Minnesota, a Democrat, and Kentucky's Governor Andy Beshear, also a Democrat, whose state was grappling with its own wave of protests following the tragic death of Breonna Taylor. Interestingly, the source noted a clear hesitation from Governor Walz when it came to accepting assistance from active-duty military, suggesting a potential clash over federal involvement.

Governor Walz, for his part, had already taken steps, deploying the National Guard to the Minneapolis region. Attorney General Barr, too, had made his own announcements, revealing plans to send in federal law enforcement resources – we're talking about the FBI and even folks from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) – all to lend a hand to local authorities, not just in Minnesota, but in other troubled spots too.

It's worth remembering, too, the tone set by President Trump himself. On a Friday morning, he took to Twitter, declaring he'd spoken with Governor Walz and issuing a stark warning: "When the looting starts, the shooting starts." That particular phrase, of course, carried a heavy historical burden, having been infamously used by a segregationist Miami police chief back in the 1960s, a detail that certainly didn't escape many.

Unsurprisingly, his fiery rhetoric ignited a swift backlash, drawing sharp criticism from a chorus of civil rights leaders and even a number of former government officials, who likely viewed it as inflammatory and counterproductive.

Amidst all this, it’s important to recall that the Department of Justice had already initiated a federal investigation into George Floyd's death itself, running concurrently with the administration's considerations for public order.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on