Delhi | 25°C (windy)

A Fiery Debate That Refuses to Fade: India's Decades-Long Struggle with Firecracker Bans

  • Nishadil
  • October 12, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 2 minutes read
  • 2 Views
A Fiery Debate That Refuses to Fade: India's Decades-Long Struggle with Firecracker Bans

Each year, as the festive season approaches, India finds itself embroiled in a familiar, often heated, debate: the banning of firecrackers. While many perceive this as a modern environmental concern, driven by contemporary air quality crises, history reveals a startling truth: this isn't a new fight.

In fact, the very same arguments about public health, air pollution, and economic waste echoed through the hallowed halls of Parliament over six decades ago.

Rewind to 1961. Amidst the discussions on the Explosives (Amendment) Bill, a far-sighted Congress MP from Rajasthan, Seth Achal Singh, bravely proposed a blanket ban on firecrackers.

His reasoning? A profound concern for the nation's well-being. He highlighted the detrimental effects on public health, the choking air pollution they caused, and the sheer financial drain on families who often struggled with basic necessities. It was a remarkably prescient call, anticipating the environmental challenges that would plague future generations.

Singh's proposition sparked a robust debate in the Lok Sabha.

The then Minister of Commerce and Industry, Nityanand Kanungo, while acknowledging the issues, deemed a complete ban impractical. Citing the deep-rooted religious and cultural significance of fireworks in Indian festivals, he suggested regulation rather than outright prohibition. This early clash between cultural traditions and environmental responsibility set the precedent for the ongoing dialogue we witness today.

The matter was even deliberated by a Joint Committee of the Parliament, indicating the seriousness with which it was initially considered.

Despite the lack of a national ban, local administrations recognized the looming threat. The Delhi Administration, for instance, took proactive steps in the 1970s and 1980s.

Driven by scientific reports that unequivocally linked firecrackers to alarming levels of sulphur dioxide and carbon monoxide, alongside excruciating noise pollution, Delhi actively imposed bans during Diwali. This demonstrated an early commitment to safeguarding public health against the festive fervor.

Yet, the cyclical nature of this debate persists.

From the Supreme Court's directives to ban barium-based crackers and promote 'green crackers' to the annual pleas for cleaner air, the core issues remain stubbornly unresolved. The irony is stark: a crucial environmental and public health debate that began over 60 years ago continues to rage, leaving one to wonder how many more decades will pass before a sustainable, universally accepted solution truly ignites.

.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on