Delhi | 25°C (windy)

A Digital Ghost: Why Idols Delete, and Why the Internet Never Truly Forgets

  • Nishadil
  • November 12, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 4 minutes read
  • 5 Views
A Digital Ghost: Why Idols Delete, and Why the Internet Never Truly Forgets

It’s a peculiar dance, isn’t it, the one K-Pop idols perform with their digital pasts? Every post, every photograph, even the casual remark, etched seemingly forever into the internet’s vast, unyielding memory. And then, there’s the curious case of deletion, a move that, for ordinary folk, might mean a simple tidy-up, but for public figures? Well, that’s where things get… complicated. Recently, Super Junior’s Siwon found himself, once again, under the harsh glare of public scrutiny, all because he decided to clean up his social media. Or rather, he removed specific posts that, in truth, tied him to a rather painful chapter from years gone by.

Specifically, the posts in question revolved around a tragic incident back in 2017 – a heart-wrenching time when his family’s dog, a French bulldog, was involved in a biting incident that, devastatingly, led to the death of a neighbor. Siwon had, quite understandably, issued a public apology at the time, acknowledging the profound sorrow and taking responsibility. Fast forward to now, years later, those apology posts – and even one celebrating the dog’s birthday – had vanished from his feed. And just like that, a digital ghost was stirred, and the whispers, then shouts, of public disapproval began anew. Had he forgotten? Was he trying to erase history?

You could say the reaction was swift, a fresh wave of criticism washing over him. For many, deleting such a significant apology felt less like moving on and more like an attempt to scrub a stained page from his public narrative. The internet, you see, rarely forgets, and it’s quick to accuse. But here’s where another voice, a familiar and trusted one, stepped into the fray. Leeteuk, the beloved leader of Super Junior, chose to speak up, offering a perspective that, perhaps, many hadn't considered.

Leeteuk, in a recent live broadcast, addressed the situation head-on, not shying away from the discomfort. And what he offered, really, was a dose of human reality. “Is deleting something a bad thing?” he pondered, a rhetorical question hanging in the digital air. He went on to explain, with a refreshing candor, that people delete posts for all sorts of reasons. Sometimes it’s simply because a certain photo doesn't quite fit the current aesthetic, or maybe the vibe of a trend has shifted. Perhaps, for once, it’s just about personal preference, a desire to curate one’s own space.

Honestly, he admitted to doing it himself, deleting posts and photos regularly – sometimes just because he felt like it. He even highlighted a moment when a stylist had asked him to take down a picture. It wasn't about malice; it was just… life. This wasn’t an attempt to justify the past tragedy, not at all, but rather to contextualize a very human behavior within the extraordinary pressure cooker of idol life. It was a plea, almost, to separate the act of deleting from the memory of the event itself.

Because, truly, in the relentless spotlight that illuminates K-Pop idols, every single action, every digital whisper, is magnified, dissected, and often, harshly judged. There’s no real room for the kind of casual digital tidying up most of us take for granted. Leeteuk’s words, then, serve as a potent reminder: Behind the polished image and the carefully curated feeds are actual people, navigating immense pressure and, yes, sometimes just trying to manage their digital lives. Whether the public accepts this human-centric view, well, that’s another story altogether, a continuous negotiation between personal space and public memory in the age of eternal online presence.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on