Delhi | 25°C (windy)

A Delicate Dance: Kerala's Left Front Navigates a Bumpy Road Over Central School Funds

  • Nishadil
  • October 25, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 2 minutes read
  • 4 Views
A Delicate Dance: Kerala's Left Front Navigates a Bumpy Road Over Central School Funds

Ah, the ever-so-delicate balance of coalition politics, wouldn't you say? In Kerala, that intricate dance is playing out right now, with the CPI(M) — the larger, dominant partner in the ruling Left Democratic Front — working diligently, almost visibly, to smooth over a rather public spat with its vital ally, the CPI. And what's at the heart of this rather inconvenient friction? Well, it all boils down to a recent decision by the state government to ink a Memorandum of Understanding, or MoU, with the Centre for something called the PM Schools for Rising India, more commonly known as the PM SHRI scheme. It's an education initiative, yes, but for the CPI, it represents a far greater concern.

You see, the CPI has not been shy about its disapproval, not one bit. Their State secretary, Kanam Rajendran, a figure of considerable influence, has been quite vocal, frankly. He’s gone on record, demanding the MoU be withdrawn immediately. His concern, and really, the CPI's broader anxiety, stems from a very real fear: the potential for centralisation in education, the insidious creep of external influence into curriculum matters, perhaps even an erosion of Kerala's distinctly progressive educational model. It’s a principled stand, one could argue, against what they perceive as an overreach from Delhi into state autonomy.

But the CPI(M) finds itself in a bit of a tight spot. On one hand, they need to maintain coalition harmony; on the other, they have to defend the government’s actions. And so, figures like P. Rajeev, who wears multiple hats as Minister for Law, Industries, and Coir, have stepped forward. His argument? The MoU, in truth, is far more limited in scope than the CPI might fear. He insists it's solely about infrastructure development for existing schools, about upgrading facilities, not about rewriting textbooks or dictating pedagogy. And, perhaps to add a touch of political symmetry, he also pointed out that a previous United Democratic Front (UDF) government had signed a similar MoU for the Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan. A precedent, then, to consider?

The PM SHRI scheme itself is, at its core, designed to upgrade some 14,500 existing schools across the country. For the first five years, it’s fully funded by the Centre, a rather tempting proposition for any state, before transitioning to a 60:40 funding model. For the CPI, though, the financial allure doesn’t outweigh the ideological risk. They view it as a direct challenge, a subtle yet significant move towards centralizing school administration, a potential Trojan horse that could, over time, undermine Kerala's cherished education model – one often lauded, mind you, for its inclusive and high-quality standards.

So, here we are, watching this internal struggle within the Left Democratic Front. It’s more than just a procedural disagreement; it’s a clash of fundamental approaches to governance, to federalism, and, indeed, to the very future of education in Kerala. The CPI(M) is certainly hoping to ease these tensions, to find common ground before this rather public disagreement threatens to deepen the cracks in their ruling alliance. A tricky negotiation, for sure, with much more at stake than just school buildings.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on