A Decade-Long Heartbreak: Noida Hospital Urged to Consider Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State
Share- Nishadil
- November 27, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 2 Views
Imagine, if you will, twelve years. A span of time that for many brings new beginnings, growth, and countless memories. But for Ram Kishor, it has been a decade-long suspension, a tragic limbo since a fateful train accident in 2011 plunged him into a persistent vegetative state (PVS). Now, in a deeply significant and, frankly, heartbreaking development, the Allahabad High Court has stepped in, directing Felix Hospital in Noida to seriously consider passive euthanasia for him.
This isn't just a legal matter; it's a profound human story, largely carried on the shoulders of his wife, Geeta. For all these years, she's been locked in an unimaginable struggle. Not only has she witnessed her husband's unchanging condition, but she's also grappled with the crushing weight of financial hardship and, heartbreakingly, her own health deterioration. All this, while trying her best to raise two young children who, quite frankly, would barely remember their father from before the accident. It's a plea born of profound despair, a request for a dignified end to a life that doctors say holds no hope of recovery.
Indeed, this isn't Geeta's first foray into this deeply complex and emotionally charged territory. Way back in 2017, she had, in a desperate attempt, approached the President of India, seeking permission for euthanasia. That plea, however, was unfortunately denied at the time. Yet, her resolve, fueled by love and an aching desire for peace, remained unbroken.
Ram Kishor's current state, as described by medical professionals, paints a grim picture. He remains unconscious, unable to communicate, see, or hear. His very existence is sustained through a feeding tube and a catheter, a testament to the comprehensive loss of his bodily functions. Doctors, after years of observation and expertise, have arrived at the difficult consensus: there is no chance, absolutely none, of him ever recovering from this state. It's a prognosis that, while medically clear, offers little comfort to a family yearning for closure.
This current legal avenue has opened thanks to the Supreme Court's landmark 2018 ruling on passive euthanasia. That judgment provided crucial guidelines, effectively permitting the withdrawal of life support for terminally ill patients under stringent safeguards. It's a legal framework that acknowledges the immense suffering and the right to a dignified end, especially when a living will exists or, as in cases like Ram Kishor's where there might not be one, through the explicit approval of a High Court.
Acting upon Geeta's compelling petition, the Allahabad High Court has now instructed Felix Hospital to form a dedicated medical board. This board, comprising three senior doctors, crucially including a neurologist, will undertake a thorough assessment of Ram Kishor's condition. Their task is to meticulously determine if his situation aligns with the Supreme Court's stringent guidelines for passive euthanasia. The hospital has been given a four-week window to submit this crucial report to the court. It's a tight deadline, yes, but one that underscores the urgency of this incredibly sensitive matter.
The hospital, for its part, has confirmed its full cooperation with the court's directive. Once the medical board's findings are presented, the court will then review the report and make a final, weighty decision. This entire process highlights the profound ethical, medical, and legal dilemmas surrounding end-of-life care. For Geeta and her children, it represents a glimmer of hope, albeit a bittersweet one, for an end to their prolonged suffering and a dignified conclusion to Ram Kishor's agonizing journey.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on