A 'D' for Doing Nothing? Unpacking the Minnesota Twins' Head-Scratching Offseason
Share- Nishadil
- February 05, 2026
- 0 Comments
- 3 minutes read
- 6 Views
MLB Analyst Slams Twins' Offseason: A 'D' Grade for Inactivity
The Minnesota Twins' quiet offseason has earned them a dismal 'D' grade from an MLB analyst, raising questions about their strategy and readiness for the upcoming season despite winning their division last year.
Well, here we are, just on the cusp of a new baseball season, and if you’re a Minnesota Twins fan, you might be feeling a mix of anticipation and… well, a good dose of head-scratching. That feeling got a pretty stark validation recently when MLB.com's Mark Feinsand dished out his offseason grades for all 30 teams. And let’s just say, for our beloved Twins, it wasn't exactly an A+ – or even a C-.
Feinsand slapped a rather dismal 'D' on the Twins' report card, and frankly, it's hard to argue with the reasoning. His assessment? The Twins "didn't really do anything" this winter to improve upon a team that, let's not forget, actually won the AL Central last year. That’s a pretty damning statement, isn’t it?
Think about it. The Twins entered the offseason with some clear needs, primarily a frontline starting pitcher and perhaps another impact bat. They also had what seemed like ample payroll flexibility. But what did we see? Not much, if we're being honest. They watched key contributors like Sonny Gray, Kenta Maeda, and Tyler Mahle depart, along with reliever Emilio Pagan. Gray, in particular, was a huge loss, finishing second in Cy Young voting!
So, who did they bring in to fill those gaps? They added Anthony DeSclafani, Josh Staumont, and Jay Jackson. Now, no disrespect to these guys – they’re certainly major league players and can contribute. DeSclafani, while a potential back-end rotation piece, comes with injury concerns, and Staumont and Jackson are bullpen arms. These aren't the kind of splashy, needle-moving acquisitions that scream "contender," are they?
It really makes you wonder, especially when you look at the free-agent market. There were quality starting pitchers out there: Blake Snell, Jordan Montgomery, even a Frankie Montas before he signed elsewhere, or a Lucas Giolito. On the hitting side, names like Lourdes Gurriel Jr., Jorge Soler, and Rhys Hoskins were available. These were players who could have genuinely bolstered the roster. But the Twins largely sat on their hands, preferring to let opportunities pass by.
The biggest move they did make was trading veteran infielder Jorge Polanco to the Mariners. While that brought back some promising prospects and offered salary relief, it arguably weakened the immediate big-league roster. It signals a lean into the future, perhaps, but at what cost to the present?
To be fair, the Twins do have an exciting crop of young talent on the rise – guys like Brooks Lee, Edouard Julien, and the highly anticipated Emmanuel Rodriguez and Walker Jenkins. Relying on internal options is commendable and can certainly pay off down the line. But expecting prospects to immediately fill the shoes of established veterans, especially those who left, feels like a risky bet for a team that just won a division title.
Ultimately, Feinsand's 'D' grade isn't just about what the Twins didn't do; it’s about the perception that they took a step backward when they had every opportunity to move forward. It’s a reflection of an offseason that prioritized caution over conviction, and frugality over immediate contention. Now, it's up to the players and coaching staff to prove that this calculated inaction wasn't a miscalculation after all. We can only hope for the best, but for now, the grade stands as a rather stark reminder of a winter that felt, well, a little too quiet.
Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on