Delhi | 25°C (windy)

A Cry for Cotton: Telangana's Farmers Caught in a Price Trap, as KTR Demands Action

  • Nishadil
  • November 17, 2025
  • 0 Comments
  • 4 minutes read
  • 7 Views
A Cry for Cotton: Telangana's Farmers Caught in a Price Trap, as KTR Demands Action

In the heart of Telangana, a quiet crisis is unfolding, one that strikes at the very root of rural livelihoods: the cotton harvest. It's a tale of struggle, really, where hardworking farmers, after months of toil, find themselves cornered, forced to part with their prized cotton much below the promised Minimum Support Price (MSP). And honestly, it’s a tough sight to see.

You see, while the official MSP stands at a hopeful Rs 7,020 per quintal, the reality on the ground is a stark contrast. Farmers are, in truth, getting a pittance, often as low as Rs 6,000 or Rs 6,500. This isn’t just a slight dip; it’s a significant blow, especially when you consider the soaring input costs and the sheer effort that goes into cultivating the crop.

This distressing situation has not, naturally, escaped the attention of K. T. Rama Rao, the BRS working president and former minister. He hasn’t just voiced his concern; he’s unleashed a pointed critique against the incumbent Congress government, highlighting what he perceives as a glaring failure in cotton procurement. His words, frankly, carry weight – a reminder of promises made, and, it would seem, promises broken.

Recall, if you will, the heady days leading up to the recent elections. The Congress party, then in opposition, had quite boldly pledged to purchase cotton at an astonishing Rs 12,000 per quintal. A grand promise, to be sure, one that offered a beacon of hope to the farming community. But now? Well, now it feels like a distant memory, replaced by the grim reality of sub-MSP sales.

The heart of the problem, according to KTR, lies in a rather insidious scheme. It’s alleged that the government, instead of directly engaging with farmers, is turning a blind eye — or worse, actively participating — in a system where middlemen are thriving. These intermediaries, for lack of a better word, are reportedly buying cotton cheap from desperate farmers, only to then offload it to the Cotton Corporation of India (CCI) at a profit. A classic case of exploitation, isn't it?

And the CCI, an entity established precisely to ensure fair prices for farmers? It seems conspicuously absent from the fray, or at least, not intervening effectively enough to stem the rot. This inaction, KTR argues, is exacerbating the farmers’ plight, leaving them vulnerable to market manipulations and the relentless pressure of financial necessity.

Why do farmers sell at such low prices, you might ask? It’s not a choice borne of greed, but rather desperation. With pressing financial needs, looming debts, and the practical challenges of storing their harvested cotton, many feel they have no option but to accept whatever price is offered, however unfair. It’s a vicious cycle, one that truly highlights the precariousness of agricultural life.

KTR's message is clear, unambiguous: the government must act, and it must act now. He’s demanding immediate procurement of cotton at the MSP, a direct purchase system through the CCI that cuts out the exploitative middlemen, and — crucially — stringent action against anyone found to be preying on the farmers’ vulnerability. Because, in truth, their livelihoods are at stake.

Furthermore, he’s issued a stark warning: should the government continue to ignore the deepening crisis, the BRS party stands ready to mobilize, to agitate, to fight for the rights of these beleaguered farmers. It's not just a political stance; it’s a call for justice, a demand that those who feed the nation are, for once, fed fairly themselves.

Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on