A Broken Promise: HIV Advocates Condemn Political Inaction on Decriminalization, Urging Leaders Like Carney to Speak Out
Share- Nishadil
- August 24, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 2 minutes read
- 5 Views

A storm of frustration is brewing among HIV advocates across Canada, directed squarely at the Liberal government and, notably, at potential leadership contender Mark Carney. At the heart of their distress lies a profound silence on a critical promise: the reform of Canada's "overbroad" laws criminalizing HIV non-disclosure.
For a community fighting tirelessly against stigma and outdated legislation, this inaction feels like a betrayal.
Canada holds the dubious distinction of being one of the world’s leading nations in prosecuting individuals for HIV non-disclosure. Despite advancements in medical science confirming that an undetectable viral load means HIV cannot be transmitted sexually (U=U), the legal system continues to apply severe criminal charges, often aggravated sexual assault, even in cases where no transmission risk exists.
This punitive approach, say advocates, isn't just archaic; it actively harms public health efforts by discouraging testing and deepening the stigma faced by people living with HIV.
The current outcry isn't without precedent. In 2019, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau himself pledged to "explore reforms to the criminal justice system" to align it with contemporary scientific understanding.
This promise, a beacon of hope for many, has since faded into the background, leaving advocates like those from the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, CATIE, and PASAN disillusioned and demanding accountability.
The spotlight has now turned sharply on Mark Carney. As a prominent Liberal figure often touted as a future leader, his silence on such a pivotal human rights and public health issue is deafening.
Advocates argue that if Carney is to truly embody progressive leadership, he must take a clear and unequivocal stand against these discriminatory laws. His current reticence is seen not merely as neutrality, but as an implicit endorsement of the status quo, deeply concerning to those who seek a more just and scientifically informed legal framework.
Advocacy groups are vocal in their condemnation.
They point out that the continued criminalization creates a chilling effect, making individuals less likely to get tested or disclose their status for fear of legal repercussions. They champion the "U=U" principle, endorsed by leading global health organizations, as the scientific basis for reform. Their message is clear: the law must reflect science, not outdated fear and prejudice.
While Justice Minister Arif Virani has acknowledged the issue, stating that the government is "looking at" the matter and engaging with provinces and territories, his comments have provided little comfort.
Without a concrete timeline or a firm commitment to legislative change, advocates perceive these statements as stalling tactics rather than genuine progress. The community needs action, not just ongoing consultations.
The human cost of these laws is immense. Individuals living with HIV face unique legal vulnerabilities, often subjected to disproportionate penalties that devastate their lives and perpetuate a cycle of shame and isolation.
It undermines decades of work in HIV prevention and treatment, transforming a treatable condition into a legal liability.
As the conversation around Liberal leadership intensifies, advocates are seizing this moment to press their case. They are calling for bold, decisive action from all political leaders, particularly those aspiring to lead the country.
The silence from figures like Mark Carney is no longer acceptable; it’s time for a clear commitment to reform, to align Canada's laws with science, human rights, and a compassionate vision for public health.
.Disclaimer: This article was generated in part using artificial intelligence and may contain errors or omissions. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. We makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. Readers are advised to verify the information independently before relying on